After building more than 100 pitch decks across every stage from pre-seed to Series F, one truth stands out: most pitches fail for the same reasons, and often for more than one.

Founders tend to assume their deck is "fine" because they know their business inside-out. But investors don't have the same context, the same depth, or the same patience. They skim. They triage. They make snap judgements — because they have to.

And the failure modes keep repeating themselves.

Below are the seven most common ways pitch decks go off the rails — and what founders should be doing instead.
‍

1. Too technical

It's natural to lead with what makes your product work, the tech is often your competitive advantage, the thing you're genuinely proud of, the reason you believe you'll win. But investors aren't evaluating your engineering capabilities in the pitch. They're evaluating market demand.

You can build something elegant, brilliant, and defensible… but if you spend your deck walking through systems diagrams, AI model architectures, or the nuances of your tech stack, you've lost the room. Not because the investor doesn't respect the work, but because they don't yet understand why it matters.

Investors want proof that customers care — not a lecture in complexity. Lead with the problem and the traction. The tech can come later, in diligence.
‍

2. Too dense

Investors get hundreds of decks. And on average? They give each less than three minutes.

That means if your slide is a wall of text, if your font size is microscopic, if every slide reads like a white paper, you're done. Dense decks are the equivalent of drinking from a firehose: you walk away more confused, not more informed.

Here's the trap: founders assume more information equals more credibility. It doesn't. Density signals insecurity, like you're trying to pre-answer every possible objection before the investor even asks. But that's not how persuasion works.

A dense deck doesn't impress. It repels.

Your job is not to tell everything. Your job is to make sure the investor remembers something.
‍

3. Too jargon-y

Industry jargon feels precise when you live in the space. It's shorthand. It's efficient. It signals you know what you're talking about.

But here's the problem: most investors are not experts in your vertical. Even specialists appreciate clarity. And generalist investors (the ones writing the majority of checks) will spend half their mental energy just decoding your language. That leaves nothing left to evaluate your opportunity.

This isn't about dumbing things down. It's about not making investors work harder than they need to. Acronyms, niche terms, procedural language, regulatory frameworks, all of it creates friction.

Speak plainly, speak powerfully.
‍

4. Buries the lede

One of the most common structural failures: the most important point comes too late.

Founders often structure decks like mysteries, building suspense, saving the best for last, hoping for a big reveal. But there is no prize for a clever narrative arc in a pitch deck. Investors don't want suspense. They want conviction and they want it quickly.

If your strongest proof points live on Slides 14–18, you've already lost them. Most investors never make it that far. And even if they do, they've already mentally categorized you based on the weak opening.

Bring the heat upfront: traction, revenue, unique insight, why now, why you win. A pitch should be structured almost backwards: start with the punchline, then support it.
‍

5. Feels generic

Investors complain about this constantly: ten decks in the same category, all making the same claims. "We're the Uber for X." "Massive TAM." "Underserved market." "Best-in-class team."

Generic framing doesn't just blend in, it signals lack of insight. It suggests you don't understand the nuance of your space, don't see the real opportunities, and don't have a differentiated strategy. You're repeating what you've heard other founders say, rather than showing what you know that others don't.

Investors back founders who see something others miss. Something contrarian. Something earned through hard experience. Something sharp.

Generic means forgettable. And forgettable means unfundable.
‍

6. No investment case

You're not pitching a product. You're pitching a business.

A business needs a path to return capital, at venture scale. That means articulating a few things very clearly:

• Why this is a large market
• Why this moment matters
• Why your approach captures value
• Why this becomes a meaningful business

Some founders never make this explicit. They talk about the product, the vision, the team, but never connect the dots to why this is a good investment. And the investor is left asking: What exactly am I investing in?

This is especially common with product-oriented founders who think the opportunity should be self-evident. It's not. Make the investment case obvious. Big market. Sharp timing. Real traction. Clear path to value capture.
‍

7. Outrageous claims

Surprisingly common and instantly disqualifying.

Huge TAMs pulled out of thin air. Multi-billion revenue projections in two years. "Trillion-dollar industry" language with no basis in reality.

The instinct makes sense: you want to show ambition, show scale, show that this is worth the investor's time. But over-inflated claims don't inspire confidence. They destroy it.

Investors don't want fantasy. They want credibility. And exaggerated projections signal one of three things: insecurity, inexperience, or a fundamental misunderstanding of how markets work.

Ambition is good. Naivety is not.
‍

Too close to see it

Most failed decks suffer from a combination of these issues — too dense and too technical; too generic and no investment case; too jargon-y and buried the lede.

And here's what it costs: not just a pass, but momentum. Months of outreach. Credibility with warm intros. The difference between a follow-up meeting and radio silence.

The reason these patterns persist? You're too close to see them. You know your business so well that your brain fills in gaps you don't realize you're leaving. You think you're being clear. You're not.

Every author needs an editor. Every great film has a director and a producer. There are brilliant scenes on the cutting room floor that would have made the movie too long or illogical.

The same is true for your pitch.

Raising soon? Let's chat